Focusing on promoting adequate railroad service, the Washington, D.C.-based Surface Transportation Board (STB), an independent adjudicatory and economic-regulatory agency charged by Congress with resolving railroad rate and service disputes and reviewing proposed railroad mergers, stated it has unanimously adopted a final rule to implement new regulations at 49 CFR part 1145. Which it said “sets forth a path for shippers and receivers to petition the Board for the prescription of a reciprocal switching statement.
Reciprocal switching has long been a prevalent topic in industry circles. As previously reported by LM, STB’s previously proposed reciprocal switching legislation offered up in 2016 would allow a rail shipper to gain access to another railroad if the shipper makes certain showings. As has been defined by the STB, reciprocal switching is a situation in which a railroad that has physical access to a specific shipper facility switches rail traffic to the facility for another railroad that does not have physical access. And the second railroad compensates that railroad that has physical access in the form of a per car switching charge, with the shipper facility gaining access to an additional railroad.
STB officials said that under this final rule, railroad shipper customers within a terminal area that have access to only one Class I rail carrier may petition the STB to order a reciprocal switching agreement when the customer’s rail service falls below specified levels. It added that Board-prescribed reciprocal switching agreements will allow shippers or receivers to gain access to an additional line haul carrier, while still allowing the incumbent carrier to compete for the customer’s traffic. It also stated that reciprocal switching orders by the Board will be for a minimum of three years and a maximum of five years, also noting that it considers the new reciprocal switching rule to be a significant step in incentivizing Class I railroads to achieve and maintain higher service levels on an ongoing basis by permitting a competing line haul carrier to offer better service to win the customer’s business.
The adoption of this final rule follows a September 2023 railroad service-focused Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) focused on reciprocal switching issued by the STB, entitled “Reciprocal Switching for Inadequate Service.” STB explained that this NPRM addresses providing freight railroad shippers “with access to reciprocal switching as a remedy for poor service.”
What was introduced in that NPRM differed from the previous incarnation, in that the STB’s proposed reciprocal switching regulations offer what it called a streamlined path for the prescription of a reciprocal switching agreement when service to a terminal-area shipper does not meet any of three performance standards. Which it said are geared towards reflecting a “minimal level of rail service below which a shipper would be entitled to relief, with each standard providing an independent path for a petitioner to obtain prescription of a reciprocal switching agreement,” adding that the standards “are intended to be unambiguous, uniform standards that employ Board-defined terms and are constantly applied across Class I carriers and their affiliated companies.
STB said the performance standards included in the final rule include:
STB added that it also requires Class I railroads to provide, within seven days of receiving a request from a shipper or receiver, all individualized performance records necessary for that shipper or receiver to file a petition under part 1145.
STB Chairman Martin J. Oberman wrote in a statement that the STB took a crucial step to lifting decades-old barriers to reciprocal switching for captive shippers, noting that this adopted rule has broken new ground in the effort to provide competitive options in an extraordinarily consolidated rail industry. And he added that no reciprocal switching orders have been issued since before 1985, and none have even been sought since 1989.
“The rail network of 1985 is a far cry from that of today, and significant change is overdue,” said Oberman. “Given the repeated episodes of severe service deterioration in recent years, and the continuing impediments to robust and consistent rail service despite the recent improvements accomplished by Class I carriers, the Board has chosen to focus on making reciprocal switching available to shippers who have suffered service problems over an extended period of time.”
Oberman also said that this new reciprocal switching rule provides access to competition where there was none, also noting that the STB is allowing competition between carriers to be the driving force for better service, “rather than heavy handed dictates by the Board.”
“Indeed, the approach of the new rule furthers the transportation policy mandated by Congress in the Staggers Act –‘to ensure the development . . .of effective competition among rail carriers’ and to ‘minimize the need for Federal regulatory control.’ I hope that the Class I carriers will heed the call of this rule and not only improve their service levels but maintain them consistently over time. If they do, they will be fulfilling their critical obligations to both their customers and the public, while at the same time minimizing the need for the Board to enact even more far-reaching regulatory requirements.
The adoption of the final rule was endorsed by Lael Brainard, National Economic Advisor for the President’s National Economic Council.
“This unanimous rule will help keep our supply chains moving on time and lower the cost of shipping goods for thousands of businesses across the country from farmers to manufacturers,” said Brainard. “In turn, businesses who depend on freight rail should pass savings on to consumers and give them a better deal.”
In a statement provided to LM, the Association of American Railroads (AAR) said that while it reviews this lengthy and complex final rule, it is important to note that from the outset, railroads have been clear about the risks of expanded switching and the resulting slippery slope toward unjustified market intervention.
“In the proposed rule, the STB was prudent to reject previous proposals that amounted to open access,” it said. “As we review the impacts of this new rule, it remains true that the well-functioning freight market will almost always achieve better outcomes than bureaucratic mandates. As such, railroads will continue to invest billions each year to enhance safety and service for the benefit of our vast mix of customers.”
The adopted final reciprocal switching rule will take effect 120 days from the date of its publication in the Federal Register, STB said.