Sales and operations alignment. It is the promise.
For many this seems like an old horse to ride. It is tough because operations and commercial teams are not naturally aligned, and the implementation of an S&OP process is not a quick fix.
What Is Different?
They are different because in today’s organization, there is not one S&OP process. Instead there are usually four to six. Each needs to be developed and refined.
Organizations are also more complex. With the evolution of global organizations, decision processes are more matrixed and the processes of planning are more complex.
The technological challenges are also greater. The average company has three to five ERP systems, and the data for S&OP comes from an average of 15 systems. There is a growing need for a visualization layer across the matrixed organization and the many technologies that need to support the S&OP process.
These are the new challenges.
What Is the Same?
The challenges for S&OP are steeped in organizational alignment and culture. The best S&OP processes are aligned and balanced with clear goals. This is more difficult that it seems. As can be seen in Figure 1, 68% of processes are out of balance. When a process is balanced the drivers of go-t0-market plans are aligned with the goals of the operations.
When there is balance, S&OP improves the potential of the organization to perform on the Effective Frontier—to balance growth, profitability, cycles and complexity.
Figure 1.
Ability to Balance the “S” and the “OP” in the S&OP Process
The organization is not naturally aligned to the same goal. As shown in Figure 2, the greatest gaps in the organization are between operations and sales. The processes of S&OP can improve alignment.
Figure 2.
Team Alignment: Importance vs. Performance
(Rated 5-7 on 7-point scale)
This happens more quickly if the process meets three conditions:
Why It Matters
Today, most companies are struggling with the ability to improve operating margins and reduce inventory levels. Nine out of ten companies are stuck at this intersection. As can be seen in Figure 3, more companies have seen a deterioration in inventory performance rather than driven improvement.
Figure 3.
Relationship Between Sales-Operations Team Alignment and Inventory Turns (2006-2013)
An effective S&OP process improves alignment between sales and operations. (To understand how we measure alignment, and the impact of alignment from S&OP maturity, reference our report on Supply Chain Alignment.)
Based on the work we’ve been doing on the Supply Chain Index, and gauging supply chain improvement, we wanted to understand how improvement in alignment improved inventory turns.
To do the analysis, we cross-tabbed multiple studies that we completed in 2013 and 2014 and then enriched the data with our financial ratio data base. The goal was to track the impact of improvements in alignment on financial ratios.
We find that improvement in alignment can drive up to a 10% improvement in inventory turns; whereas the lack of alignment can result in a negative impact on inventory turns of 2%.
Balance drives alignment. Alignment drives balance sheet improvement.
Keep riding the horse….
About the Author
Lora Cecere is the Founder and CEO of Supply Chain Insights, the research firm that’s paving new directions in building thought-leading supply chain research. She is also the author of the enterprise software blog Supply Chain Shaman. The blog focuses on the use of enterprise applications to drive supply chain excellence. Her book, Bricks Matter, was published in December of 2012.
Related: How Choices in Supply Chain Management Can Impact Your Corporate Performance